To achieve our overarching aim, we implemented a flat and transparent organizational structure enabling innovative research by lean, goal-directed management.
The Advisory Board represents our stakeholders. It monitors the organizational aspects of our research and educational programmes in biannual meetings with the programme director.
Scientific Advisory Board
The Scientific Advisory Board, consisting of (inter)national researchers who are excellent representatives of our field, monitors the quality of our research and educational programme. It receives annual reports and meets with a representative group of LiI researchers every second year. On this basis it advises the Scientific Board of our consortium on the design and implementation of the research programme and on the achievement of its scientific aims.
The Scientific Board (SB), consisting of the programme director and representatives from the Work Packages and Big Questions, is responsible for the overall programme. The SB meets every two months, taking all the major decisions regarding scientific, educational, financial and communication issues. The SB safeguards the internal progress and quality of our work by monitoring, reviewing, assessing and ultimately approving all proposals for activities coming from the work packages, the Educational Team and the Management Team.
We exploited the already existing excellent graduate programmes in our field by forming of an Educational Team consisting of the representatives of the graduate schools with central contributions to the PhD training programme.
The Management Team is responsible for assuring efficient planning, control and organization of all scientific, educational and financial structures and meetings, as well as for organizing all dissemination and PR activities.
The research programme is organized into seven focused, but coherent Work Packages (WPs) with clear and open procedures to promote collaborative, innovative, interdisciplinary research at the cutting edge of the field. Five scientific WPs define the content of the research programme. These WPs are based on a decomposition of the human language faculty into its key components, the remaining two WPs provide the interface between research, methods and utilization.
Language in Interaction is in the process of stepping up the consortium-wide collaborations. Towards the future the programme has defined five “Big Questions” (BQs) in which teams of researchers will collaborate to address collectively the key questions of our field that only a consortium of this nature can tackle. The BQs are considered as central to our understanding of the human language faculty, and questions where the LiI-members believe the consortium can make significant steps forward in answering them.